I've posted about the DOJ lawsuit before, and about literary agents writing letters because they feared a settlement would be "onerous" to publishing as we know it.
And now I'm linking to an article by Manufacturing.net that talks about how Apple allegedly wanted readers to pay more for e-books.
U.S. District Judge Denise Cote noted in her written ruling that Jobs had made statements that agreements between the publishers and Apple Inc., based in Cupertino, Calif., would cause consumers to "pay a little more" and that prices would "be the same" at Apple and Amazon.com.
The judge noted that Jobs told the publishers that "the customer pays a little more, but that's what you want anyway."
I'm sure there's more to come from all this. And it sounds as if Judge Cote isn't buying any of it.